DOLEFUL DOLLARS: Barack Obama's decision to forgo public financing for his presidential campaign is at once understandable and unfortunate. Obama's low estimation of a system plagued by loopholes, lobbyists and smear-ready 527s is appropriate--"public financing...is broken, and we face opponents who have become masters at gaming this system," he explained. There is a clear strategic rationale for employing his $168 million fundraising advantage to beat John McCain in November. Obama has pledged to overhaul the system once he reaches the White House--his support for the Fair Elections Now Act in the Senate shows a commitment to this issue--and though it's a bitter pill to swallow, some campaign finance reformers are giving him the benefit of the doubt. "His decision today is not one that furthers reform in the short run," read a statement from the Public Campaign Action Fund, but Obama "now has a special obligation to make passage of comprehensive public financing of all federal elections a priority if elected."
Others are less sanguine, like Senate colleague and staunch reformer Russ Feingold, who said flatly, "This is not a good decision." Obama made an early vow to work within the system, and the campaign promised to "aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election." His change of heart rightly raises questions about his commitment to a politics free from special interests.
Although Obama speaks of a "grassroots movement of over 1.5 million Americans" that has "fueled this campaign with donations of $5, $10, $20," the truth is, his campaign is largely reliant on corporate millions and at times has been misleadingly vague about its donor base. In a February debate, Obama claimed, "We have now raised 90 percent of our donations from small donors," a figure his campaign reiterated after the public financing decision.
Subscribe Now!
The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.
There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.
- Get The Nation at home (and online!) for 75 cents a week!
- If you like this article, consider making a donation to The Nation.

Buzzflash
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mixx it!
Reddit
RSS