The Nation.



Sanger vs. Sanger

By Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow

This article appeared in the July 30, 2007 edition of The Nation.

July 12, 2007

On January 17, 1916, the eve of her scheduled obscenity trial, Margaret Sanger addressed a gathering of supporters. A political radical and former nurse who would go on to found Planned Parenthood, Sanger had been indicted for the distribution of her fiery paper "The Woman Rebel," which advocated contraception. More than a hundred guests attended a dinner to listen to the comely wife and mother who had caused such a stir. The prepared text of her speech proclaimed--with typographical fervor presumably matched in her delivery--"THERE is nothing new, nothing radical in birth control. Aristotle advocated it; Plato advocated it; all our great and modern thinkers have advocated it!"

It was true that contraception--Sanger and her comrades coined the term "birth control" in 1914--had been practiced, or attempted, for millennia; ancient Egyptians had blocked sperm with a paste made of crocodile dung. But in the United States at the time, birth control was legally restricted and widely inaccessible, especially for the poor. In the previous century, a thriving market in prophylactics had provoked a conservative crackdown. The federal Comstock Act, passed in 1873, made it illegal to send "obscene" materials, including contraceptive devices and information, through the mail. Although the manufacture and sale of the devices were generally allowed, various state laws prohibited advertisements, doctors' prescriptions and use. These legal constraints, combined with the expense and taboo, meant, for many couples, coitus interruptus or pregnancy--or, frequently, both.

Birth control's enemies worried that it would encourage fornication and subvert traditional gender roles. (Their fears were, of course, not unfounded.) According to the Catholic Church, sex, even in marriage, was for procreation alone, and contraception would debase conjugal relations. Some called it "child murder." Essentially, all of the objections to birth control anticipated those more familiar today in reference to abortion.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow

Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow is a contributing writer for the Boston Globe’s Ideas section. more...
Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» Campaign 08

Obama's New Southern Strategy: Send Biden | Biden's populism--emotional, visceral-- makes the Democratic message feel relevant again. And that will resonate in the south.
Bob Moser

» The Notion

Don't Make Afghanistan the Democrats' War | Memo to Obama/Biden: Drop the mantra that it's "the good war"
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Beat

It Looks a Lot Like Unity | Overcoming internal divisions--and a century of tortured political history-Democrats chose Barack Obama as their presidential nominee.
John Nichols

» ActNow!

Leave No Soldier Behind | Can we talk about Iraq now?
Peter Rothberg

» Capitolism

Remember Katrina? | The storm-sized hole at the DNC
Christopher Hayes

» Editor's Cut

Taking On Poverty and Inequality | Unless (and until) we tackle the gap between the very rich and the rest of America--it will be increasingly difficult to confront the major challenges of our time.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Dreyfuss Report

US Massacres Afghan Kids | So much for Obama's "right war."
Robert Dreyfuss

» And Another Thing

In Search of the Elusive PUMAs | Were they McCain supporters all along?
Katha Pollitt