The Nation.



Racists & Robber Barons

By David L. Kirp

This article appeared in the July 30, 2007 edition of The Nation.

July 12, 2007

Justice Stephen Breyer is the very model of a decorous Supreme Court Justice. That's why his impassioned soliloquy condemning the majority's decision in the school desegregation cases, delivered on the last day of the Court's term, drew so much attention. Those opinions "threaten the promise" of Brown v. Board of Education, he said. "This is a decision that the Court and the nation will come to regret."

These cases represent the last chapter in the half-century effort to end racial isolation in the public schools. The Seattle and Louisville integration plans that the five-member majority struck down are remarkable in their modesty. These communities weren't sending kids across town on long bus rides in the name of racial balance, and neither of them was using a strict racial quota to assign students. "I am not aware of any district that is actively seeing the broad-based use of a race-based mechanism to dictate large portions of the districts' student assignments," says Joseph Olchefske, former superintendent of schools in Seattle. In both cities, race was simply a tiebreaker in determining which students could attend a popular school. There has to be some rule for making decisions in these cases--race was selected, says Olchefske, because it's "a way of promoting a better environment for learning." What's wrong with that?

These two cities came to adopt race-sensitive choice plans in ways that reflect their local political values. In the 1970s, confronted by threats of a desegregation lawsuit, Seattle began to bus students; when that arrangement generated widespread hostility, the district settled for a more modest, and more educationally defensible, process that allowed more than 90 percent of the students to attend their first- or second-choice school.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About David L. Kirp

David L. Kirp, professor of public policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, is the author of Almost Home: America's Love-Hate Relationship With Community (Princeton).David L. Kirp's dissection of American universities, Shakespeare, Einstein, and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education, has just been published by Harvard University Press. His latest book, The Sandbox Investment: The Preschool Movement and Kids-First Politics, will be published in August. more...
Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» Editor's Cut

Bernie Strikes Back | Sen. Sanders decries GOP red-baiting in an exclusive Q & A.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Notion

Palin Reverses Press Ban | This shouldn't even be news, but yes, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has announced she will actually take questions from the press.
Ari Melber

» Campaign 08

Not-Ready-for-Prime-Time Palin | GOP puts its candidate in a political witness protection program.
John Nichols

» The Beat

What McCain Needs to Tell Us About Sarah Palin | Interviewing the VP choice is important, but the real questions can only be answered by McCain.
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

McCain and The Forrestal | Back in '67, McCain did recognize the horror of war. But he chose horror.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Capitolism

Community Organizers Fight Back | These people are not particularly practiced in taking things lying down.
Christopher Hayes

» ActNow!

Power Vote | New effort to build a green youth voter bloc of one million is growing.
Peter Rothberg

» And Another Thing

Sarah Palin, Wrong Woman for the Job | Seriously, people! Life is not a Lifetime movie.
Katha Pollitt