The Nation.



A Turning Point

This article appeared in the April 16, 2007 edition of The Nation.

March 29, 2007

The nation has arrived at an important political moment, a turning point in Congressional efforts to confront the President on his failed war. The House has passed, and as we went to press the Senate was on its way to passing, military spending bills that include benchmarks and timelines for bringing the troops home.

These actions did not come about simply because members of Congress suddenly saw the folly of Bush's war. Rather, they occurred because politicians listened to their constituents: the antiwar activists once dismissed as unpatriotic or worse, the parents whose sons and daughters are being forced to return to Iraq for second and third tours of duty, the ordinary citizens who no longer believe the lies of the Administration about why we invaded Iraq or why we need to stay. Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson, who had refused to support a withdrawal date just two weeks earlier, was among those who voted to reject a Republican effort to strip the timeline from the Senate spending bill. His explanation for the change of heart? "People want our troops home." The earfuls Nelson and others are hearing in their districts are reinforced by the findings of a new Pew Research poll, which reports that 59 percent of Americans surveyed want their representative to support withdrawal by August 2008.

To be sure, the votes were not easy ones, given the bills' uncertain benchmarks and the fact that their main focus was on providing yet more money for the Administration's war effort. Some antiwar members in the House simply could not bring themselves to join the razor-thin 218-212 majority. We respect those, like Congressman John Lewis, who told the House, "I will not and cannot vote for another dollar or another dime to support this war." But we also understand the sentiments of those like Representative Maurice Hinchey, who voted in favor. Had the House not passed the bill, Hinchey said, "Congress would have essentially been forced to hand the President a massive check to continue the occupation of Iraq with no benchmarks for success and no timeline for withdrawal."

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.
Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» Campaign 08

Obama's New Southern Strategy: Send Biden | Biden's populism--emotional, visceral-- makes the Democratic message feel relevant again. And that will resonate in the south.
Bob Moser

» The Notion

Don't Make Afghanistan the Democrats' War | Memo to Obama/Biden: Drop the mantra that it's "the good war"
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Beat

It Looks a Lot Like Unity | Overcoming internal divisions--and a century of tortured political history-Democrats chose Barack Obama as their presidential nominee.
John Nichols

» ActNow!

Leave No Soldier Behind | Can we talk about Iraq now?
Peter Rothberg

» Capitolism

Remember Katrina? | The storm-sized hole at the DNC
Christopher Hayes

» Editor's Cut

Taking On Poverty and Inequality | Unless (and until) we tackle the gap between the very rich and the rest of America--it will be increasingly difficult to confront the major challenges of our time.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Dreyfuss Report

US Massacres Afghan Kids | So much for Obama's "right war."
Robert Dreyfuss

» And Another Thing

In Search of the Elusive PUMAs | Were they McCain supporters all along?
Katha Pollitt