The Nation.



I Can't Get No Satisfaction

By Christine Smallwood

This article appeared in the December 11, 2006 edition of The Nation.

November 22, 2006

Once upon a time, half a century ago, American women washed dishes, packed lunches and, being good housewives, downed a pill or two to get through the day. Slowly, a panic overtook the gentler sex: Is this it? The dam broke open: Books were written, meetings were called, marches were marched. Rights--abortion, maternity leave, Title IX, sexual discrimination policies--were won. Brandishing said rights, women stormed the workplace, the halls of Congress, even the armed forces. And while inappropriate squeezes, delayed promotions and a few firings betrayed their second-class status, they persisted. They had arrived. Thirty years later, a generation of new women--young women--entered the workforce expecting to be treated as equals, despite--or was it because of?--the fact that they shaved their underarms. But they still only made 81 cents on the dollar of their male co-workers. They still had to do an awful load of dishes at night. And when there were babies to be had, well, they were the ones staying home and nodding off to Teletubbies. They were disappointed, and confused. Was this that glorious future that been promised them?

And then Laura Kipnis opened her laptop, and lo, it was good. Now the author of Against Love: A Polemic, a smart and brackish book that brought this hitherto unknown feminist scholar and video artist to the attention of The New Yorker and half the blogosphere, has struck again. Her new book, The Female Thing, examines the very question our tale leaves hanging: What happened to gender equality? Why has the movement that once seemed a matter of destiny kind of, well, broken down?

Kipnis turns a mirror on women, observing that if they wanted to smash the patriarchy, they probably could, given their sheer number--so could it be that maybe they don't want to? Perhaps, she ventures, women ought to stop blaming men and get reacquainted with the "collaborator within," the one who cleans feverishly, obsesses over her supposed flaws and maybe isn't so sure she wants to be liberated--whatever that means--after all.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About Christine Smallwood

Christine Smallwood is a former associate literary editor of The Nation and co-editor of The Crier magazine. more...
Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» The Notion

Palin and "The Lumberjack Song" | Why are people saying Palin has no accomplishments?
Jon Wiener

» Campaign 08

Palin as McCain's Greatest Move | Whatever her qualifications, Sarah Palin is a welcome new voice in GOP presidential politics. Today, McCain and Obama have something worthwhile in common.
Ari Melber

» ActNow!

Take Back Labor Day | World-class music, cutting-edge activism, family fun and podcasts. Plus videos from Billy Bragg, Pete Seeger and Phil Ochs.
Peter Rothberg

» Capitolism

Sarah Palin, Buchananite | McCain appeases the base.
Christopher Hayes

» The Beat

Obama's Tough New Populism | Trading soaring rhetoric for a smart and incisive populism, Barack Obama is taking his campaign to the people.
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

For the Record: Obama, Biden on Georgia | Two tough guys.
Robert Dreyfuss

» And Another Thing

I Heart Michelle Obama | Will she be able to reassure white voters?
Katha Pollitt

» Editor's Cut

Taking On Poverty and Inequality | Until we close the gap between the very rich and the rest of America, we can't confront the major challenges of our time.
Katrina vanden Heuvel