The People Versus AIDS

By Richard Kim

This article appeared in the July 10, 2006 edition of The Nation.

June 21, 2006

At a historic UNGASS (UN General Assembly special session) in 2001, Kofi Annan declared war on AIDS. He did not intend this war to become permanent, for the "fight against AIDS" to become a fixture of global politics. Deadlines were set: universal access to treatment by 2010, a reversal of the epidemic by 2015. In early June, five years after UNGASS and twenty-five years after the first reported cases of the disease, world leaders reconvened to assess the state of this war, and despite significant progress in funding and treatment, many concluded that the UN's benchmark goals are quickly moving out of reach. "The epidemic that has inflicted the single greatest reversal in the history of human development...continues to outpace us," warned Annan at the close of UNGASS+5.

Yet there is some reason for optimism. Five years ago there was little internationally coordinated funding for AIDS, no alphabet soup of agencies dedicated to fighting it--no US PEPFAR (President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), no WHO 3x5 (the World Health Organization's plan to treat 3 million people by 2005), no Global Fund. Big Pharma fiercely resisted price discounting and generic production of antiretrovirals; trade officials in wealthy nations agreed and also helped to stymie much-needed debt relief. In short, whole swaths of the developing world were left for dead.

This is no longer the case. Last year the world spent $8.3 billion on HIV/AIDS, up from a paltry $1.2 billion in 2000. The G-8 members have pledged $38 billion in debt relief to seventeen poor nations. These steps have produced results on the ground: WHO has put 1.3 million new people on life-saving medications at prices once thought impossible, and after the IMF canceled $5 billion of Zambia's debt, President Levy Mwanawasa announced free basic healthcare for all citizens.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About Richard Kim

Richard Kim is an associate editor at The Nation. He writes frequently about race, sexuality and popular culture. Kim is a co-editor of the forthcoming anthology A New Queer Agenda (NYU Press). more...
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» State of Change

Don't Confuse Susan Rice with Condi | Sending Susan Rice to the UN proves Obama's serious about putting diplomacy back at the center of US foreign policy.
Ari Berman
Posted at 10:50 ET

» The Notion

DC to Delhi: Only Our Missiles -- Not Yours | What is Rice going to say to India: only DC not Delhi is allowed to bomb Pakistan?
Laura Flanders

» Act Now!

World AIDS Day | How to help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic.
Peter Rothberg

» The Beat

Why Obama's Got "Complete Confidence" In Clinton | She won't bring the change his backers believed in. But Obama never really shared that belief.
John Nichols

» Editor's Cut

Robert Gates: Wrong Man for the Job | What we need after eight ruinous years is experience informed by good judgment.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama's New Team at State, Defense, NSC | And some comments about why John Brennan didn't get the CIA job.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Create a demand for green cars.
Jane Hamsher

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes

» And Another Thing

Election Updates --Good News and Not | Details on some ongoing stories
Katha Pollitt