The People Versus AIDS

By Richard Kim

This article appeared in the July 10, 2006 edition of The Nation.

June 21, 2006

At a historic UNGASS (UN General Assembly special session) in 2001, Kofi Annan declared war on AIDS. He did not intend this war to become permanent, for the "fight against AIDS" to become a fixture of global politics. Deadlines were set: universal access to treatment by 2010, a reversal of the epidemic by 2015. In early June, five years after UNGASS and twenty-five years after the first reported cases of the disease, world leaders reconvened to assess the state of this war, and despite significant progress in funding and treatment, many concluded that the UN's benchmark goals are quickly moving out of reach. "The epidemic that has inflicted the single greatest reversal in the history of human development...continues to outpace us," warned Annan at the close of UNGASS+5.

Yet there is some reason for optimism. Five years ago there was little internationally coordinated funding for AIDS, no alphabet soup of agencies dedicated to fighting it--no US PEPFAR (President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), no WHO 3x5 (the World Health Organization's plan to treat 3 million people by 2005), no Global Fund. Big Pharma fiercely resisted price discounting and generic production of antiretrovirals; trade officials in wealthy nations agreed and also helped to stymie much-needed debt relief. In short, whole swaths of the developing world were left for dead.

This is no longer the case. Last year the world spent $8.3 billion on HIV/AIDS, up from a paltry $1.2 billion in 2000. The G-8 members have pledged $38 billion in debt relief to seventeen poor nations. These steps have produced results on the ground: WHO has put 1.3 million new people on life-saving medications at prices once thought impossible, and after the IMF canceled $5 billion of Zambia's debt, President Levy Mwanawasa announced free basic healthcare for all citizens.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About Richard Kim

Richard Kim is a senior editor at The Nation. more...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

House Passes Health Reform, But Without Reproductive Rights | Pelosi secures necessary votes, but only after allowing anti-choice Dems to bar access to abortion in new programs.
John Nichols
149 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
13 Comments

» The Notion

Injustice in Illinois | Prosecutors in Illinois should be more concerned with an innocent man behind bars than journalism students' grades.
Ari Berman
28 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama Fails in Middle East | Clinton delivers the ultimate diss to Abbas.
Robert Dreyfuss
141 Comments

» Act Now!

Equality Across America | This week, young LBGT activists are staging a National Week of Initiative.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman