Twenty Ways to Think About Bush and His Money

By Micah L. Sifry & David Corn

This article appeared in the March 1, 2004 edition of The Nation.

February 12, 2004

While the Democratic presidential candidates were bickering among themselves over accepting campaign contributions from lobbyists, a far more significant political development occurred: George W. Bush broke his own record for presidential fundraising. He hit $131 million as of the end of January. (In 2000 he raised $101 million for the entire race.) His campaign aides have said their goal is $170 million. But at the rate he's going, Bush is on track to bag more than $200 million, perhaps even a quarter of a billion dollars. And all this is for a primary campaign in which he has no opponent. Bush will have to spend these funds before the GOP convention in September. That is when his campaign will get a check from the US Treasury for about $74 million, under the law that provides public funding to presidential candidates for the general election. Even though Bush has no rivals in his bid for the Republican nomination, he does have to face attacks from the Democrats. It is not unreasonable for him to raise some money for that. But $250 million? In politics--as in most walks of life--this is a mind-boggling sum. So we have crafted a few unorthodox measurements to place Bush's pile of moola in perspective.

Bush could compensate 20,000 Enron workers for their loss in pension funds--but at only about 25-50 cents on the dollar. And Bush's projected campaign total will nearly equal the amount Enron would have received from the retroactive corporate-tax rebate Bush tried (and failed) to enact after 9/11.

This is the cost of removing 23 million landmines in Egypt left over from World War II.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About Micah L. Sifry

Micah L. Sifry is co-founder of the techPresident.com group blog and author of Spoiling for a Fight: Third-Party Politics in America (Routledge). more...

About David Corn

David Corn is Mother Jones' Washington bureau chief. Until 2007, he was The Nation's Washington editor and is co-author, with Michael Isikoff, of Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War.

Corn's work has appeared in the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Harper's Magazine and many other publications. His books include The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception (a New York Times bestseller), Blond Ghost: Ted Shackley and the CIA's Crusade and the novel Deep Background.

more...
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» And Another Thing

Can you help "Nickie"? | Bringing the abortion debate down to earth
Katha Pollitt
Posted at 4:54 PM ET

» State of Change

Georgia Runoff is About More Than Filibusters | A Democratic win in this tough race would signal an important shift in southern politics.
John Nichols
Posted at 2:17 PM ET

» The Notion

DC to Delhi: Only Our Missiles -- Not Yours | What is Rice going to say to India: only DC not Delhi is allowed to bomb Pakistan?
Laura Flanders

» Act Now!

World AIDS Day | How to help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic.
Peter Rothberg

» The Beat

Why Obama's Got "Complete Confidence" In Clinton | She won't bring the change his backers believed in. But Obama never really shared that belief.
John Nichols

» Editor's Cut

Robert Gates: Wrong Man for the Job | What we need after eight ruinous years is experience informed by good judgment.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama's New Team at State, Defense, NSC | And some comments about why John Brennan didn't get the CIA job.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Create a demand for green cars.
Jane Hamsher

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes