Privatizing Medicare

By Trudy Lieberman

This article appeared in the July 7, 2003 edition of The Nation.

June 19, 2003

The Medicare bills passed by the Senate Finance Committee on June 12 and the House Ways and Means Committee on June 17 move the thirty-eight-year-old social insurance program one step closer to privatization. The committees outlined the acceptable framework for a drug benefit sorely needed by the 40 million seniors and disabled people covered by Medicare. Considering that the median income for beneficiaries is only $14,300, and a quarter of them spend more than $100 a month on prescriptions, the need for government help is obvious.

But all the talk of a drug benefit obscures the real reason Republicans are pushing hard for their brand of reform, which calls for privately run managed-care plans to provide the benefit. Adding government-subsidized drug coverage to Medicare doesn't require managed care. Congress could simply add a Part C drug benefit and be done with it. But many lawmakers have another agenda--to get the government out of the Medicare business. To do that, they would herd beneficiaries into managed care, either HMOs or the less tightly controlled PPOs (preferred provider organizations), which would provide all benefits instead of the federal government. The government would give plans a sum of money, as it does now, to pay for care, but over time it could give less and less. Beneficiaries would have to make up the difference, which could be huge, since costs are not likely to go down. Eventually there would be no Medicare, with its social insurance cross-subsidies that make it possible to insure huge numbers of people 65 or older, who are more likely to be ill. Everyone would get benefits in the private market.

Until June 12 the Bush Administration had hoped to entice beneficiaries into HMOs and PPOs by offering drug benefits only to those willing to leave traditional Medicare. But Bush changed his mind, and under the Senate Finance Committee plan, even those who stay in Medicare will get some drug coverage. That was enough to persuade some Democrats, including Ted Kennedy, to sign on. The House bill also gives a benefit to those remaining on Medicare but would not require the government to step in with a benefit if the private plans don't provide the coverage.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About Trudy Lieberman

Trudy Lieberman, a regular Nation contributor on healthcare, is director of the health and medicine reporting program at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism. She is also reporting on media coverage of healthcare for the Campaign Desk of the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR.org). more...
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» Editor's Cut

Robert Gates: Wrong Man for the Job | What we need after eight ruinous years is experience informed by good judgment.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Posted at 9:40 ET

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama's New Team at State, Defense, NSC | And some comments about why John Brennan didn't get the CIA job.
Robert Dreyfuss
Posted at 8:36 ET

» State of Change

Barack Obama's AIDS Advocacy | He has always said this fight must be an all-hands-on-deck effort.
John Nichols
Posted at 7:30 ET

» The Beat

Why Obama Picked Clinton for Secretary of State | She's not the change most Obama backers believed in, but president-elect never really shared that belief.
John Nichols

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Until the government adopts policy that creates demand for green cars, there is no evidence that anyone will buy them.
Jane Hamsher

» Act Now!

Power Shift 2009 | Ten thousand young activists are planning to underscore the urgency of dramatic action on climate change.
Peter Rothberg

» The Notion

Custodians of Empire | The Obama national security team is now heaving into view and their motto might be: a steady hand and the same old thoughts.
Tom Engelhardt

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes

» And Another Thing

Election Updates --Good News and Not | Details on some ongoing stories
Katha Pollitt