The burgeoning Far East crisis has exposed the bankruptcy of US Korea policy. Kim Jong Il's resort to nuclear threats, however deplorable, was predictable--even rational, given the hostility and bluster the Bush Administration has directed at him.

Consider: The Pentagon's $60 billion-plus Alaska-based anti-missile defense system was sold in part on the premise that North Korea was an enemy likely to launch a missile attack. Bush added North Korea to the "axis of evil" in his 2002 State of the Union address in what was more a rhetorical flourish than a considered policy judgment. In the Administration's Nuclear Posture Review, North Korea made the short list of nations that would be subject to a pre-emptive nuclear strike--a radical departure from past nuclear doctrine. Pyongyang was also stiffed out of two nuclear reactors for domestic energy needs promised in 1994 under the Clinton Administration's Agreed Framework, and the Bush team trashed South Korean President Kim Dae Jung's policy of reconciliation of the two Koreas. And then, as Tim Shorrock reports on page 18, the Administration broke off talks after Pyongyang confessed to a nuclear enrichment program, even though North Korea reportedly offered to halt the program in exchange for a written agreement that the United States would not launch a pre-emptive attack on it. Now, Washington says it's willing to talk--but only to discuss how North Korea plans to end its nuclear buildup.

The incoherence--or duplicity--of US policy stands revealed as Bush now reassures the world that the North Korean situation should be resolved by diplomacy, while insisting that war may be necessary to disarm Iraq, rich in oil the US covets but at best a second-rate military power that has submitted to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors. Meanwhile, South Koreans are furious that Washington's actions could expose them to North Korean retaliatory missiles, and could result in a flood of refugees.

Subscriber Login

User Name

Password

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

• Get The Nation at home (and online!) for 75 cents a week!
• If you like this article, consider making a donation to The Nation.