Official Secrets Law

By David Cole

This article appeared in the November 20, 2000 edition of The Nation.

November 2, 2000

At the close of its session, Congress considered two bills addressing classified information. One had been pending for more than a year, had more than a hundred co-sponsors, was the subject of two lengthy hearings and received virtually unanimous approval in amended form from the House Judiciary Committee. The other was quietly attached to an intelligence authorization bill and was never the subject of public hearings. But secrecy has a way of trumping democracy, and the latter, which one member of Congress accurately termed an "official secrets act," passed, while the former, which would have restricted government reliance on classified evidence in immigration proceedings, died on the floor. At press time it was unclear whether Clinton would sign or veto the secrecy bill.

The Intelligence Authorization Act would make it a felony for government officials to disclose any "properly classified" information. That is eminently reasonable. By law, information may be classified only if its release would threaten national security, and officials with security clearances should not be allowed to abuse that authority by releasing information that imperils the nation.

But in practice, information is often classified that has no real potential for undermining national security, as is routinely demonstrated when leaks are made public without the sky falling. Because the entire process is secret, there is no effective check on classification decisions. The Clinton Administration--which has actually been more sensitive to the problem of overclassification than many of its predecessors--created more than 8 million new secrets in 1999 alone. And once a secret is classified, it is often decades before it is declassified, if ever.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About David Cole

David Cole (cole@law.georgetown.edu), The Nation's legal affairs correspondent and a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, is the author of Justice at War: The Men and Ideas That Shaped America's War on Terror, just out from New York Review Books, as well as No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System (New Press) and Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terrorism (New Press). He is also co-author, with James X. Dempsey, of Terrorism and the Constitution: Sacrificing Civil Liberties for National Security (New Press), and, with Jules Lobel, of Less Safe, Less Free: Why America Is Losing the War on Terror (New Press). more...
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» The Notion

FDR Mania | Turn to News.Google.com, if you want to take the temperature of American hopes and fears right now.
Tom Engelhardt
Posted at 3:52 PM ET

» State of Change

Obama's Big Tent | His foreign policy team has more ideological continuity with the President-elect than contrasts.
Ari Berman
Posted at 2:14 PM ET

» Act Now!

World AIDS Day | How to help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic.
Peter Rothberg
Posted at 12:36 ET

» The Beat

Why Obama's Got "Complete Confidence" In Clinton | She won't bring the change his backers believed in. But Obama never really shared that belief.
John Nichols
Posted at 11:44 ET

» Editor's Cut

Robert Gates: Wrong Man for the Job | What we need after eight ruinous years is experience informed by good judgment.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama's New Team at State, Defense, NSC | And some comments about why John Brennan didn't get the CIA job.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Create a demand for green cars.
Jane Hamsher

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes

» And Another Thing

Election Updates --Good News and Not | Details on some ongoing stories
Katha Pollitt