Web Letters: Getting Pakistan Wrong

Comment

By Graham Usher

This article appeared in the July 14, 2008 edition of The Nation.

June 26, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

If you prefer, you may submit a letter to the print edition only.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • I firmly believe that Pakistan's army is the source of all the trouble in Pakistani society. I am not saying this because I personally have had any bad experience with them. No, the reason is that our budget for any year--doesn’t matter, present or past--sets aside more than 50 percent for the army in the name of defense. This means the army cannot defend us until they have properties for prices much, much below the market value. They can't save us unless their children can attend the best schools; if ordinary parents try to enroll their brilliant kids in that school, they are prohibited by the monthly fees, which are equal to that family’s budget for two months (maybe more). Army personnel have their secured jobs with high school pass-or-fail diploma, but they don’t care if masters degree holders are jobless. And this frustration is drawing teenagers, parents, everyone into crime. The army doesn’t care if somebody rapes an innocent teenage girl, because they're doing the same thing (Example: Dr. Shazia's story is not too old.).

    In the last sixty years, Pakistan's army, under the command of fascist generals, has betrayed the nation four times. The generals have no respect for their oath and our constitution. Moreover, they have used their political influence to transform the military into an organized crime syndicate and a business mafia. This organization is the biggest stakeholder and stockholder in every big business in Pakistan. It has the biggest share in Pakistan’s stock exchange, commercial banks, airlines, steel, cement, Telecom, petroleum and energy, education, sports, healthcare and even grocery chains and bakeries. In short, the army's monopoly is present in every sector of Pakistan’s economy. On the other hand, its performance at its profession is nil--the Pakistani army, ranked the seventh-biggest in the world, has not conquered a single inch of terrain. In fact, it has only brought embarrassment to the nation in the battlefields of Kargil and Dhaka, and now with these Swat extremists.

    Nowhere in the world is the army is allowed to interfere with the civilian administration, but Pakistan's army is exceptional. Any ordinary member of the army can go to any civil administration office and can do whatever he want to. He's wearing an army uniform, so he can even take out arrested criminals, without any bail.

    If Pakistan's army would be honest with its duties, which includes defending the borders and obeying the civil government of Pakistan and its judiciary, then Pakistan would be different. Pakistan's army never liked civilian governments. That’s the reason it openly attacked civilian governments, but always a sudden attack--cowardly. Pakistan has a civilian government, but actually the army has all the strings in its hands, and all politicians are its puppets.

    The first solution for Pakistan is to bind the army to only one duty, which is to defend borders.

    I know it is very difficult for Pakistanis who already are in crises, but I also know that when the public gathers its anger and frustration to use it as a weapon, the army will at least think twice before doing anything wrong to civilians.

    Most important citizens are the Pakistani women. They have to step up and stand in front of this male-dominant army and, of course, male-dominant society.

    Mrs. Abeer Khan

    West Palm Beach, FL

    08/09/2008 @ 11:06pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» State of Change

Obama Anoints Kaine, Praises (And Snubs?) Dean | Obama and Kaine signal they'll continue the fifty-state strategy, but why wasn't Dean in the building?
Ari Berman
Posted at 5:17 PM ET

» Altercation

Altercation 3.0 | Altercation takes up residence today at The Nation. In this incarnation, expect more music and movies and maybe a little less politics. But first, a word about Cass Sunstein.
Eric Alterman
Posted at 3:45 PM ET

» Editor's Cut

Obama Must Get Afghanistan Right | If he doesn't, the US will be stuck in another military catastrophe.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» Capitolism

ET Come Home | Tom Friedman testifies on Capitol Hill on green technology
Christopher Hayes

» The Beat

Feingold's Outline for a Constitutional Presidency | In a letter to Obama, Constitution subcommittee chair seeks a commitment to end executive excess.
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

Panetta? Ummmmm... Well..... | Could Obama have made a weirder choice for CIA director? Here's why Panetta is doomed.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Act Now!

Allow Media into Gaza | Israel is encouraging abuses by preventing foreign journalists from entering the Gaza Strip.
Peter Rothberg

» The Notion

Hard Times Without Studs | One of Terkel’s former book editors considers a Studs-less world.
Tom Engelhardt

» And Another Thing

Bill Ayers Whitewashes History, Again | The Weathermen were not just a bunch of idealistic young people.
Katha Pollitt