Web Letters: Supreme Court Deals Death Blow to Gitmo

By Jonathan Hafetz

June 12, 2008

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Norman Ravitch, in his letter below, seems to be under the impression that the Constitution is like the Bible, a document that boasts over 600 versions. Sorry to disappoint him, but the Constitution is the only one of its kind, and the equal protection clause happens to be a time-tested amendment. He asserts that the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriages in the first place is not a federal but a state ruling--this is based on the state constitution, which appropriately reflects the nation's. Ravitch may not remember or believe this, but blacks used to be prevented in fact, barred by law, to marry whites. In Virginia, it was not until 1967 that that wholly illegal statute was struck down.

    I too am not particularly interested in seeing men marry men or women marry women, but I also recognize that marriage is an institution, subject to equal protection under the law to all. Ravitch's prejudices don't merit a hoot. As for the Guantánamo "detainees," as human beings on our soil, they like anyone else are now under our laws. If a foreign immigrant breaks one of our laws, he/she is due the prosecution he/she deserves. We cannot prosecute anyone according to our laws but deny them the same rights any accused person has under our laws. You cannot have it both ways.

    It's people who consistently think along the lines of thought Ravitch has expressed who, frankly, make this world a more dangerous place in which to live. I can only hope he is not fully in their camp.

    Riad Mahayni

    Richmond, VA

    06/13/2008 @ 2:58pm


  • If it were not enough that the California Supreme Court ruled against traditional marriage with no real justification except ideology, now the Federal Surpeme Court has extended rights to terrorists. What this means is that Barack Obama is sunk. McCain can claim with justification that the issue of judicial appointments points to his victory and not Obama's. If the left would only learn, but it is incapable of learning.

    The left refuses to understand SALVS POPVLI SVPREMA LEX.

    Norman Ravitch

    Savannah, GA

    06/12/2008 @ 6:21pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

House Passes Health Reform, But Without Reproductive Rights | Pelosi secures necessary votes, but only after allowing anti-choice Dems to bar access to abortion in new programs.
John Nichols
189 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
38 Comments

» The Notion

Injustice in Illinois | Prosecutors in Illinois should be more concerned with an innocent man behind bars than journalism students' grades.
Ari Berman
31 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama Fails in Middle East | Clinton delivers the ultimate diss to Abbas.
Robert Dreyfuss
170 Comments

» Act Now!

Equality Across America | This week, young LBGT activists are staging a National Week of Initiative.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman