Web Letters: It's Easier to Insure Pets Than Kids

By Barbara Ehrenreich

July 26, 2007

Write a Web letter about this article.

What's a Web Letter?

Web Letters are continuously published e-mails from real people, signed with their real names. No registration is required. Each article page on The Nation includes a Web Letters link.

Read the best Web Letters on this page.

We're committed to publishing your comments as they are received. We place a red star () on the best submissions and may edit your e-mail for length or content. Your e-mail address will not be published or shared with any third party without your consent.

We look forward to hearing from you.

  • Ms. Ehrenreich: Great article! Your description of a political system and insurance industry that provide healthcare insurance for our pets, while many of our children go lacking for medical care, illustrates the great hypocrisy of our capitalistic society. The current American healthcare system seems to be just another "bait and switch" (I'm reading your book) flimflam that the politicians and the insurance industry have perpetrated on America's middle and working class and poor. I look forward to the day when we will have a healthcare system that will provide medical coverage for all Americans.

    Conversely, I can't see how profit-oriented businesses can provide good healthcare insurance. It is difficult to imagine the profit motive being compatible with providing healthcare--there appears to be a vast and insurmountable hurdle that divides the two concepts.

    The incompatibility of the health insurance industry's profit motive with the provisioning of healthcare was even understood by President Richard Nixon. Michael Moore's movie Sicko points out that Nixon was a big supporter of the development of health maintenance organizations--the healthcare profit machines that are the bane of good medical care.

    John Scott

    Cave Creek, AZ

    07/27/2007 @ 8:05pm


  • Are we not paying ten billion dollars a month for the "pre-emptive" invasion in Iraq? I think the program is $80 billion for five years! Where is the shame from not only this Administration but Congress, MSN and the people?

    Eileen Harris

    Kensington, MD

    07/26/2007 @ 8:12pm


Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

House Passes Health Reform, But Without Reproductive Rights | Pelosi secures necessary votes, but only after allowing anti-choice Dems to bar access to abortion in new programs.
John Nichols
187 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
38 Comments

» The Notion

Injustice in Illinois | Prosecutors in Illinois should be more concerned with an innocent man behind bars than journalism students' grades.
Ari Berman
31 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama Fails in Middle East | Clinton delivers the ultimate diss to Abbas.
Robert Dreyfuss
170 Comments

» Act Now!

Equality Across America | This week, young LBGT activists are staging a National Week of Initiative.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman